Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractPrediction of lung cancer using volatile biomarkers in breath    Next AbstractVolatile biomarkers in the breath of women with breast cancer »

Tuberculosis (Edinb)


Title:Volatile biomarkers of pulmonary tuberculosis in the breath
Author(s):Phillips M; Cataneo RN; Condos R; Ring Erickson GA; Greenberg J; La Bombardi V; Munawar MI; Tietje O;
Address:"Menssana Research Inc., Fort Lee, NJ 07024, USA. mphillips@menssanaresearch.com"
Journal Title:Tuberculosis (Edinb)
Year:2007
Volume:20060425
Issue:1
Page Number:44 - 52
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2006.03.004
ISSN/ISBN:1472-9792 (Print) 1472-9792 (Linking)
Abstract:"Pulmonary tuberculosis may alter volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath because Mycobacteria and oxidative stress resulting from Mycobacterial infection both generate distinctive VOCs. The objective of this study was to determine if breath VOCs contain biomarkers of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Head space VOCs from cultured Mycobacterium tuberculosis were captured on sorbent traps and assayed by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (GC/MS). One hundred and thirty different VOCs were consistently detected. The most abundant were naphthalene, 1-methyl-, 3-heptanone, methylcyclododecane, heptane, 2,2,4,6,6-pentamethyl-, benzene, 1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-, and cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl-. Breath VOCs were assayed by GC/MS in 42 patients hospitalized for suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis and in 59 healthy controls. Sputum cultures were positive for Mycobacteria in 23/42 and negative in19/42 patients. Breath markers of oxidative stress were increased in all hospitalized patients (p<0.04). Pattern recognition analysis and fuzzy logic analysis of breath VOCs independently distinguished healthy controls from hospitalized patients with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Fuzzy logic analysis identified patients with positive sputum cultures with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity (95.7% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity on leave-one-out cross-validation); breath VOC markers were similar to those observed in vitro, including naphthalene, 1-methyl- and cyclohexane, 1,4-dimethyl-. Pattern recognition analysis identified patients with positive sputum cultures with 82.6% sensitivity (19/23) and 100% specificity (18/18), employing 12 principal components from 134 breath VOCs. We conclude that volatile biomarkers in breath were sensitive and specific for pulmonary tuberculosis: the breath test distinguished between 'sick versus well' i.e. between normal controls and patients hospitalized for suspicion of pulmonary tuberculosis, and between infected versus non-infected patients i.e. between those whose sputum cultures were positive or negative for Mycobacteria"
Keywords:Adult Alkanes/analysis Benzene Derivatives/analysis Biomarkers/*analysis Breath Tests/*methods Bronchiectasis/diagnosis/microbiology Fuzzy Logic Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods Humans Middle Aged Multivariate Analysis Mycobacterium tuberculos;
Notes:"MedlinePhillips, Michael Cataneo, Renee N Condos, Rany Ring Erickson, Gerald A Greenberg, Joel La Bombardi, Vincent Munawar, Muhammad I Tietje, Olaf eng 1R43 AI52504-01/AI/NIAID NIH HHS/ Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Scotland 2006/04/26 Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2007 Jan; 87(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2006.03.004. Epub 2006 Apr 25"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 18-11-2024