Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSystemic release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles by turnips infested by concealed root-feeding larvae Delia radicum L    Next AbstractPheromone binding proteins of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) are encoded at a single locus »

Proc Biol Sci


Title:The ownership signature in mouse scent marks is involatile
Author(s):Nevison CM; Armstrong S; Beynon RJ; Humphries RE; Hurst JL;
Address:"Animal Behaviour Group, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst, Neston CH64 7TE, UK"
Journal Title:Proc Biol Sci
Year:2003
Volume:270
Issue:1527
Page Number:1957 - 1963
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2452
ISSN/ISBN:0962-8452 (Print) 1471-2954 (Electronic) 0962-8452 (Linking)
Abstract:"Male house mice advertise their territory ownership through urinary scent marks and use individual-specific patterns of major urinary proteins (MUPs) to discriminate between their own scent and that of other males. It is not clear whether recognition occurs through discrimination of the non-volatile proteins or protein-ligand complexes (direct model), or by the detection of volatile ligands that are released from MUPs (indirect model). To examine the mechanism underlying individual scent mark signatures, we compared investigatory and countermarking responses of male laboratory mice presented with male scent marks from a strain with a different MUP pattern, when they could contact the scent or when contact was prevented by a porous nitrocellulose sheet to which proteins bind. Mice investigated scent marks from other males whether these were covered or not, and biochemical analysis confirmed that the porous cover did not prevent the release of volatiles from scent marks. Having gained information through investigation, mice increased their own scent marking only if they had direct contact with another male's urine, failing to do this when contact was prevented. Individual signatures in scent marks thus appear to be carried by non-volatile proteins or by non-volatile protein-ligand complexes, rather than by volatiles emanating from the scent"
Keywords:*Animal Communication Animals Male Mice Pheromones/physiology/*urine Proteins/*physiology Smell/*physiology *Territoriality;
Notes:"MedlineNevison, C M Armstrong, S Beynon, R J Humphries, R E Hurst, J L eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2003/10/17 Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Sep 22; 270(1527):1957-63. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2452"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024