« Previous AbstractUnique function of a chemosensory protein in the proboscis of two Helicoverpa species    Next AbstractOverexpression of Drosophila juvenile hormone esterase binding protein results in anti-JH effects and reduced pheromone abundance »

Tree Physiol

Title:		Variations in the secondary metabolite camptothecin in relation to tissue age and season in Camptotheca acuminata
Author(s):		Liu Z; Carpenter SB; Bourgeois WJ; Yu Y; Constantin RJ; Falcon MJ; Adams JC;
Address:		"School of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA"
Journal Title:		Tree Physiol
Year:		1998
Volume:		18
Issue:		4
Page Number:		265 - 270
DOI:		10.1093/treephys/18.4.265
ISSN/ISBN:		1758-4469 (Electronic) 0829-318X (Linking)
Abstract:		"We investigated variation in concentration of the secondary metabolite, camptothecin (CPT), in relation to leaf, branch and tree age, season, and leaf drying method in Camptotheca acuminata Decaisne saplings. Younger leaves contained higher CPT concentrations than older leaves. Within a branch, there was a linear decline in CPT concentration from leaves at the apex of the branch down to Leaf 7. Comparing leaves of similar age, those from younger trees had higher CPT concentrations than those from older trees. Over the course of the growing season, there was a steady decline of 11% per month in leaf CPT concentration. Branches showed a similar seasonal decline in CPT concentration to leaves; however, the rate of decline was threefold greater in leaves than in branches. Freeze-dried tissues had a 27% higher CPT concentration than oven- or air-dried tissues, suggesting that oven- and air-drying caused degradation of CPT. The decline in CPT concentration with tissue aging may reflect a genetically determined mechanism whereby, in young trees, chemicals serve as a first line of defense against attacks by herbivores and pathogenic microorganisms until other mechanisms are developed and deployed. We hypothesize that chemical defense mechanisms are programmed for early ontogenic stages, whereas they are induced by biotic and abiotic factors during later ontogenic stages"
Keywords:
Notes:		"PubMed-not-MEDLINELiu, Zhijun Carpenter, Stanley B Bourgeois, Wayne J Yu, Ying Constantin, Roysell J Falcon, Matthew J Adams, John C eng Canada 2003/03/26 Tree Physiol. 1998 Apr; 18(4):265-270. doi: 10.1093/treephys/18.4.265"