Title: | Transfer of pheromone-inducible plasmids between Enterococcus faecalis in the Syrian hamster gastrointestinal tract |
Author(s): | Huycke MM; Gilmore MS; Jett BD; Booth JL; |
Address: | "Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City" |
DOI: | 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1188 |
ISSN/ISBN: | 0022-1899 (Print) 0022-1899 (Linking) |
Abstract: | "Pheromone-responsive plasmids are common to Enterococcus faecalis, transfer at high frequency in vitro, and carry cytolysin and other gene products implicated in the pathogenesis of enterococcal infection. A Syrian hamster model of enterococcal intestinal overgrowth was used to test for transfer of three isogenic plasmids differing in conjugative and cytolytic phenotypes. Transconjugants were found in 8 (44%) of 18 and 6 (35%) of 17 hamsters given donor strains containing cytolytic (pAM714) and noncytolytic (pAM771) pheromone-responsive plasmids. Of the 14 hamsters from which transconjugants were isolated from stool, 9 (64%) had transconjugants 1 day after donor strain inoculation. The frequency of transfer (mean +/- SD) for pAM714 and pAM771 was 1.4 +/- 2.2 x 10(-1) and 2.9 +/- 4.2 x 10(-2) transconjugants/donor, respectively (P > .20). Transconjugants were not recovered from hamsters receiving a cytolytic, nonconjugative plasmid (pAM930; transfer frequency < 2 x 10(-5) transconjugants/donor). Pheromone-responsive plasmid transfer between E. faecalis strains occurs at high frequency in the gastrointestinal tract of hamsters and may be one means by which enterococcal resistance and virulence factors disseminate" |
Keywords: | "Amino Acid Sequence Animals Anti-Bacterial Agents/*pharmacology *Conjugation, Genetic Cricetinae Crosses, Genetic Digestive System/*microbiology Drug Resistance, Microbial Enterococcus faecalis/drug effects/*genetics/growth & development Erythromycin/phar;" |
Notes: | "MedlineHuycke, M M Gilmore, M S Jett, B D Booth, J L eng EY-08289/EY/NEI NIH HHS/ Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. 1992/11/01 J Infect Dis. 1992 Nov; 166(5):1188-91. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1188" |