Title: | Separating the attractant from the toxicant improves attract-and-kill of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) |
Author(s): | Huang J; Gut LJ; Miller JR; |
Address: | "Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, 578 Wilson Road, East Lansing, MI 48864, USA. huangju@msu.edu" |
ISSN/ISBN: | 0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking) |
Abstract: | "The behavior of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), responding to three attract-and-kill devices was compared in flight tunnel experiments measuring attraction and duration of target contact. Placing a 7.6 by 12.6 cm card immediately upwind of a rubber septum releasing pheromone, dramatically increased the duration on the target to > 60 s. In this setting, nearly all the males flew upwind, landed on the card first, and spent the majority of time searching the card. In contrast, male codling moths spent < 15 s at the source if given the lure only. In a forced contact bioassay, knockdown rate or mortality of male codling moths increased in direct proportion to duration of contact on a lambda-cyhalothrin-loaded filter paper. When this insecticide-treated paper was placed immediately upwind of the lure in the flight tunnel, > 90% of males contacting the paper were knocked down 2 h after voluntary exposure. These findings suggest that past attempts to combine insecticide directly with sex pheromones into a small paste, gel, or other forms of dollops are ill-advised because moths are likely over-exposed to pheromone and vacate the target before obtaining a lethal dose of insecticide. It is better to minimize direct contact with the concentrated pheromone while enticing males to extensively search insecticide-treated surface nearby the lure" |
Keywords: | Animals Dodecanol/*analogs & derivatives/pharmacology Insect Control/*methods Insecticides/*pharmacology Male Moths/*drug effects/physiology Nitriles/*pharmacology Pheromones/*pharmacology Pyrethrins/*pharmacology Random Allocation; |
Notes: | "MedlineHuang, Juan Gut, Larry J Miller, James R eng Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2013/11/15 J Econ Entomol. 2013 Oct; 106(5):2144-50. doi: 10.1603/ec13152" |