Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractSorbent trapping of volatile organic compounds from air    Next Abstract"Olfactory and behavioural responses of tsetse flies, Glossina spp., to rumen metabolites" »

Adv Exp Med Biol


Title:The strengths and weaknesses of the electronic nose
Author(s):Harper WJ;
Address:"Department of Food Science and Technology, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210, USA"
Journal Title:Adv Exp Med Biol
Year:2001
Volume:488
Issue:
Page Number:59 - 71
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1247-9_5
ISSN/ISBN:0065-2598 (Print) 0065-2598 (Linking)
Abstract:"Arrays of electronic sensors, capable of detecting and differentiating complex mixtures of volatile compounds, have been utilized to differentiate aromas of food and related materials. These sensor arrays have been dubbed 'Electronic Noses' and have been commercially available in the USA for the past 4-5 years. Electronic nose technology is still in its development phase, both in respect to hardware and software development. The instruments contain an array of from one to 32 sensors, using a variety of different sensor technologies--from organic polymers to metal oxides to micro-balances. Electronic noses are being widely used by some companies as a quality control instrument. Strengths include high sensitivity and correlation to human sensory panels for many applications. Limitations to their full potential includes loss of sensitivity in the presence of water vapor or high concentrations of a single component like alcohol; sensor drift and the inability to provide absolute calibration: relatively short life of some sensors; necessity to do considerable method development work for each specific application; and lack of being able to obtain quantitative data for aroma differences. They do have a high sensitivity (ppt to ppm) and are often more sensitive than the human nose. There is some evidence that sensors differentiate aromas on the basis of relatively few compounds and in the future a relationship between specific chemicals and a single flavor attribute may be achievable. Also, the possibility exists to differentiate between 'top' and 'middle' notes of aroma"
Keywords:"Biosensing Techniques/*instrumentation/*methods Calibration Chromatography, Gas/methods Computers Electronics Food Analysis/instrumentation/methods Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry/methods Odorants/*analysis Quality Control Sensitivity and Specificity;"
Notes:"MedlineHarper, W J eng Review 2001/09/08 Adv Exp Med Biol. 2001; 488:59-71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1247-9_5"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024