Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractOperating mechanism and molecular dynamics of pheromone-binding protein ASP1 as influenced by pH    Next AbstractPerformance enhancement of a biofilter with pH buffering and filter bed supporting material in removal of chlorobenzene »

Sci Total Environ


Title:Treatment of hydrophobic volatile organic compounds using two-liquid phase biofilters
Author(s):Han MF; Wang C; Fu Y;
Address:"School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China. School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; Tianjin Key Lab of Indoor Air Environmental Quality Control, Tianjin 300072, China. Electronic address: wangcan@tju.edu.cn"
Journal Title:Sci Total Environ
Year:2018
Volume:20180607
Issue:
Page Number:1447 - 1454
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.400
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1026 (Electronic) 0048-9697 (Linking)
Abstract:"The traditional one-liquid phase biofilter (OLPB), with water as the selected liquid phase, demonstrated low performance to volatile hydrophobic organic compounds. In this study, a novel two-liquid phase biofilter (TLPB) using silicone oil and water was established to treat gaseous dichloromethane (DCM). A comprehensive investigation of removal performance, kinetic analysis, biomass accumulations, pressure drops, CO(2) productions, and microbial communities of the two biofilters was compared. Results showed that TLPB presented an average removal efficiency of 85% during 200?ª+days of operation, which was higher than that of OLPB (63%). Owing to the buffering effects caused by silicone oil, TLPB demonstrated a superior fluctuation resistance capability than OLPB. TLPB was determined at a higher actual mass distribution coefficient of 6.00 than that of the OLPB (3.99), thereby suggesting a significantly more effective mass transfer process inside TLPB compared with that in OLPB. Furthermore, a rapid biomass accumulation process was observed in TLPB. The specific growth rates of biomass in OLPB and TLPB were calculated as 0.035 and 0.026?ª+g of dry biomass/g of dry filter per day, respectively. The carbon balances were analyzed in the two biofilters. The yield coefficients (Y) were determined at 1.449 and 1.143?ª+g of dry biomass/g of removed VOC for OLPB and TLPB, respectively. However, the corresponding CO(2) production fraction was 0.263?ª+g and 0.316?ª+g per 1?ª+g of DCM for OLPB and TLPB, respectively. The variations in fraction of carbon in DCM transformation to biomass and to CO(2) suggested distinct microbial transformation pathways of utilizing DCM in the two biofilters, which were mainly caused by the different microbial communities and metabolic activities"
Keywords:Dichloromethane Hydrophobic VOCs Silicone oil Transformation pathway Two-liquid phase biofilters;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEHan, Meng-Fei Wang, Can Fu, Yan eng Netherlands 2018/07/20 Sci Total Environ. 2018 Nov 1; 640-641:1447-1454. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.400. Epub 2018 Jun 7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024