Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractUnique methodological characteristics of the urine in volatile organic compound analysis    Next AbstractWater-stable all-biodegradable microparticles in nanofibers by electrospinning of aqueous dispersions for biotechnical plant protection »

J Sci Food Agric


Title:"Volatile organic compounds of tobacco leaves versus waste (scrap, dust, and midrib): extraction and optimization"
Author(s):Banozic M; Aladic K; Jerkovic I; Jokic S;
Address:"Faculty of Food Technology Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Osijek, Croatia. Faculty of Chemistry and Technology, University of Split, Split, Croatia"
Journal Title:J Sci Food Agric
Year:2021
Volume:20200929
Issue:5
Page Number:1822 - 1832
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10796
ISSN/ISBN:1097-0010 (Electronic) 0022-5142 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND: Volatile organic compounds are present at very low concentration but exhibit an important influence on flavor and aroma of tobacco leaves and products. During tobacco processing, at different stages, tobacco wastes occur. Since they are delivered directly from the tobacco plant, they are expected to have a similar aroma profile. RESULTS: The volatile composition of three types of tobacco waste (scrap, dust, and midrib) was characterized for the first time and compared with tobacco leaves' volatile composition. Ultrasound-assisted extraction with hexane followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was successfully applied. Different ultrasound-assisted extraction parameters (temperature, time, and solvent:solid ratio) showed a significant influence on the volatile profiles of the extracts obtained. The most important compounds in tobacco leaves, scrap, and dust with the highest abundance were nicotine (up to 87.5%), 4,8,13-duvatriene-1,3-diol (up to 16.2%), and neophytadiene (up to 9.4%). In midrib, only nicotine was present in all extracts. The most abundant compounds in the extracts were quantified and subjected to optimization using response surface methodology. CONCLUSION: Regression analysis showed that 83-98% of the variation was explained by the models obtained. The experimentally obtained values agreed with those predicted, thus indicating the suitability of the model employed and the success of response surface methodology in optimizing the extraction conditions. (c) 2020 Society of Chemical Industry"
Keywords:Chemical Fractionation/instrumentation/*methods Dust/*analysis Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Plant Leaves/chemistry Tobacco/*chemistry Ultrasonics Volatile Organic Compounds/*chemistry/*isolation & purification Waste Products/*analysis extraction o;
Notes:"MedlineBanozic, Marija Aladic, Krunoslav Jerkovic, Igor Jokic, Stela eng Evaluation Study England 2020/09/09 J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Mar 30; 101(5):1822-1832. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10796. Epub 2020 Sep 29"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 27-11-2024