Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Complex Interactions among Sheep, Insects, Grass, and Fungi in a Simple New Zealand Grazing System"    Next AbstractEvaluation of impact of shale gas operations in the Barnett Shale region on volatile organic compounds in air and potential human health risks »

Ground Water


Title:Carry-over effects of the membrane interface probe
Author(s):Bumberger J; Radny D; Berndsen A; Goblirsch T; Flachowsky J; Dietrich P;
Address:"UFZ, Department Monitoring and Exploration Technologies, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany. jan.bumberger@ufz.de"
Journal Title:Ground Water
Year:2012
Volume:20111109
Issue:4
Page Number:578 - 584
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00879.x
ISSN/ISBN:1745-6584 (Electronic) 0017-467X (Linking)
Abstract:"The membrane interface probe (MIP) is widely used to characterize the subsurface distribution of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). One problem that arises during MIP application is that disproportionately high MIP signals are obtained after passing source zones which contain mobile or residual phases. This serious problem occurs because of a carry-over effect, in particular caused by compound-specific retention times in the conventional unheated transfer line, commonly used during such an investigation. The objective of this study was to perform a qualitative methodical field evaluation of the carry-over effect of a conventional MIP system with a conventional unheated transfer line. This was achieved by coupling a mobile mass spectrometer to the MIP device. Results obtained were then further compared with those achieved using a laser induced fluorescence (LIF) system. Because of this coupling, time- and depth-dependent signals for different substances became known. Field evaluation data obtained showed complex superpositions of compounds with MIP system results. As a result of this superposition, MIP signals from the saturated zone beneath the source zone (zone with free and/or residual phase) are blurred and are therefore not representative of particular depths. However, utilizing multidirectional probing alongside conventional MIP probing (forwards and backwards), it was possible to detect the upper and lower phase boundary of the source zone. These MIP results correlated excellently with the LIF results. An important conclusion that can be drawn from the field investigation is that coupling a mobile mass spectrometer to the MIP system enables advanced MIP signal interpretation to be successfully achieved"
Keywords:"Algorithms Environmental Monitoring/*instrumentation Groundwater/*analysis Mass Spectrometry Membranes, Artificial Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical/*analysis Water Pollution, Chemical/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineBumberger, Jan Radny, Dirk Berndsen, Andreas Goblirsch, Tobias Flachowsky, Johannes Dietrich, Peter eng Evaluation Study 2011/11/11 Ground Water. 2012 Jul-Aug; 50(4):578-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00879.x. Epub 2011 Nov 9"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 21-11-2024