Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA detoxification pathway initiated by a nuclear receptor TcHR96h in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval)    Next AbstractBreaking the cipher: ant eavesdropping on the variational trail pheromone of its termite prey »

Huan Jing Ke Xue


Title:[Implementation of an electronic nose for rapid detection of volatile chloralkane and chloroalkene]
Author(s):Wen XG; Liu R; Cai Q; Wan M; Tang LR; Chen LJ;
Address:"Nanhu College, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China. wenxg.thzj@gmail.com"
Journal Title:Huan Jing Ke Xue
Year:2012
Volume:33
Issue:11
Page Number:4012 - 4017
DOI:
ISSN/ISBN:0250-3301 (Print) 0250-3301 (Linking)
Abstract:"An electronic nose, core detector of which was composed of three metal-doped SnO2 gas sensors and a photo ionization detector (PID) as a sensor array, was developed for rapid detection of volatile chloralkane and chloroalkene. A gas recognition model was developed based on test and analysis with nine of pure gas and five of mixtures, and then the electronic nose was applied to several water samples and the validity was evaluated with a gas chromatography. The results revealed that the sensor array responded differently between the chloralkane and chloroalkene. PID was less sensitive to chloralkane, while linearly responded to chloroalkene (R2 > 0.997). Sensor TGS2602 performed sensitive to carbon tetrachloride (CT), trichloromethane (TCM) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), with a linear response to the former two but a poor linear response to 1,2-DCA. Sensors TGS2600 and TGS2620 were by far more sensitive and linearly (R2 > 0.995) responded to dichloromethane (DCM) and 1,2-DCA. Therefore in the final gas recognition model, PID was used to determine the concentration of chloroalkene, sensor TGS2602 was used to determine CT and TCM, sensor TGS2600 or TGS2620 was used to determine DCM and 1,2-DCA. When applied to gas mixtures, sensor TGS2602 responded less sensitive than the sum of the response to each single component, while other sensors responded equally. The electronic nose showed a determined result linearly correlated to GC (R2 > 0.96) as applied to samples with a mixture of DCM and perchloroethylene"
Keywords:"Air Pollutants/*analysis *Alkanes/analysis/chemistry Carbon Tetrachloride/analysis Chloroform/analysis *Electronic Nose Equipment Design Hydrocarbons, Chlorinated/chemistry Methylene Chloride/analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineWen, Xiao-Gang Liu, Rui Cai, Qiang Wan, Mei Tang, Ling-Rong Chen, Lu-Jun chi English Abstract Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't China 2013/01/18 Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2012 Nov; 33(11):4012-7"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024