Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractExhaled breath metabolomics reveals a pathogen-specific response in a rat pneumonia model for two human pathogenic bacteria: a proof-of-concept study    Next AbstractDifferential effectiveness of microbially induced resistance against herbivorous insects in Arabidopsis »

Analyst


Title:Detection and quantification of exhaled volatile organic compounds in mechanically ventilated patients - comparison of two sampling methods
Author(s):van Oort PMP; White IR; Ahmed W; Johnson C; Bannard-Smith J; Felton T; Bos LD; Goodacre R; Dark P; Fowler SJ;
Address:"Department of Intensive Care, Amsterdam UMC - location Academic Medical Centre (AMC), Amsterdam, the Netherlands"
Journal Title:Analyst
Year:2021
Volume:146
Issue:1
Page Number:222 - 231
DOI: 10.1039/c9an01134j
ISSN/ISBN:1364-5528 (Electronic) 0003-2654 (Linking)
Abstract:"Exhaled breath analysis is a promising new diagnostic tool, but currently no standardised method for sampling is available in mechanically ventilated patients. We compared two breath sampling methods, first using an artificial ventilator circuit, then in 'real life' in mechanically ventilated patients on the intensive care unit. In the laboratory circuit, a 24-component synthetic-breath volatile organic compound (VOC) mixture was injected into the system as air was sampled: (A) through a port on the exhalation limb of the circuit and (B) through a closed endo-bronchial suction catheter. Sorbent tubes were used to collect samples for analysis by thermal desorption-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Realistic mechanical ventilation rates and breath pressure-volume loops were established and method detection limits (MDLs) were calculated for all VOCs. Higher yields of VOCs were retrieved using the closed suction catheter; however, for several VOCs MDLs were compromised due to the background signal associated with plastic and rubber components in the catheters. Different brands of suction catheter were compared. Exhaled VOC data from 40 patient samples collected at two sites were then used to calculate the proportion of data analysed above the MDL. The relative performance of the two methods differed depending on the VOC under study and both methods showed sensitivity towards different exhaled VOCs. Furthermore, method performance differed depending on recruitment site, as the centres were equipped with different brands of respiratory equipment, an important consideration for the design of multicentre studies investigating exhaled VOCs in mechanically ventilated patients"
Keywords:"Breath Tests Exhalation Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Humans Respiration, Artificial *Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis;"
Notes:"Medlinevan Oort, Pouline M P White, Iain R Ahmed, Waqar Johnson, Craig Bannard-Smith, Jonathan Felton, Timothy Bos, Lieuwe D Goodacre, Royston Dark, Paul Fowler, Stephen J eng II-LA-0214-20009/DH_/Department of Health/United Kingdom England 2020/10/27 Analyst. 2021 Jan 4; 146(1):222-231. doi: 10.1039/c9an01134j"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024