Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCombining tactics to exploit Allee effects for eradication of alien insect populations    Next Abstract"Development of single-dispenser pheromone suppression of Epiphyas postvittana, Planotortrix octo and Ctenopseustis obliquana in New Zealand stone fruit orchards" »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Communication disruption of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by using two formulations at four point source densities in vineyards
Author(s):Suckling DM; Brockerhoff EG; Stringer LD; Butler RC; Campbell DM; Mosser LK; Cooperband MF;
Address:"The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, PB 4704, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. max.suckling@plantandfood.co.nz"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2012
Volume:105
Issue:5
Page Number:1694 - 1701
DOI: 10.1603/ec12130
ISSN/ISBN:0022-0493 (Print) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Light brown apple moth [Epiphyas postvittana (Walker)] is now established as an economic and quarantine pest in California, and new technologies are being investigated to increase options for its management. Two new organic formulations for mating disruption, SPLAT LBAM HD-O and organic Hercon Biotie (biodegradable) were field tested at four point source densities (25, 72, 322, and 500/ha) and compared with the standard Isomate LBAM Plus (500/ha, as a positive control) and an untreated (negative) control. Assessment involved trapping using synthetic lures and virgin females. In total, 175,776 male light brown apple moths were caught to both the caged females and synthetic lures, from 10 February to 19 May 2011. The light brown apple moth catch dramatically decreased from baseline measurements after the treatments were applied, with the highest density treatments reducing catch to below 10% of the catch in the untreated controls within the first week (> 90% disruption). In synthetic lure traps, the SPLAT and Biotie treatment performed similarly well over all rates (P = 0.317 for posttreatment percentage communication disruption), but SPLAT performed better at disrupting virgin female traps (P = 0.045). There was a significant increase in disruption with an increasing number of points/ha (P < 0.001). Disruption of communication was similar for all three technologies (SPLAT, Biotie and Isomate) at 500 points/ha for both types of trap (P > 0.74). Disruption of this species in vineyards is thus highly feasible"
Keywords:Animals California Female Fruit Insect Control/*instrumentation/*methods Insecticides Male *Moths *Sex Attractants *Vitis;
Notes:"MedlineSuckling, David M Brockerhoff, Eckehard G Stringer, Lloyd D Butler, Ruth C Campbell, Delyse M Mosser, Lisa K Cooperband, Miriam F eng Comparative Study Evaluation Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2012/11/20 J Econ Entomol. 2012 Oct; 105(5):1694-701. doi: 10.1603/ec12130"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 05-12-2024