Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"The absence of Emp24p, a component of ER-derived COPII-coated vesicles, causes a defect in transport of selected proteins to the Golgi"    Next AbstractComparison of toluene removal in air at atmospheric conditions by different corona discharges »

Meat Sci


Title:Aroma development in high pressure treated beef and chicken meat compared to raw and heat treated
Author(s):Schindler S; Krings U; Berger RG; Orlien V;
Address:"Institute of Food Chemistry, Leibniz Universitat Hannover, Callinstrasse 5, D-30167 Hanover, Germany"
Journal Title:Meat Sci
Year:2010
Volume:20100505
Issue:2
Page Number:317 - 323
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036
ISSN/ISBN:1873-4138 (Electronic) 0309-1740 (Linking)
Abstract:"Chicken breast and beef muscle were treated at 400 and 600 MPa for 15 min at 5 degrees C and compared to raw meat and a heated sample (100 degrees C for 15 min). Vacuum-packed beef meat with a smaller fraction of unsaturated fatty acids showed better oxidative stability during 14 days of cold storage, as shown by a low steady-state level of hydroperoxide values, than vacuum-packed chicken meat. Accordingly, the critical pressures of 400 MPa and 600 MPa for chicken breast and beef sirloin, respectively, were established. Volatiles released after opening of the meat bags or during storage of open meat bags, simulating consumer behaviour, were measured under conditions mimicking eating. Quantitative and olfactory analysis of pressurised meat gave a total of 46 flavour volatiles, mainly alcohols (11), aldehydes (15), and ketones (11), but all in low abundance after 14 days of storage. Overall, beef meat contained less volatiles and in lower abundance (factor of 5) compared to chicken meat. The most important odour active volatiles (GC-O) were well below the detection thresholds necessary to impart a perceivable off-flavour. Lipid oxidation was significantly accelerated during 24h of cold storage in both cooked chicken and beef when exposed to oxygen, while the pressurised and oxygen-exposed chicken and beef meat remained stable. Pressure treatment of beef and chicken did not induce severe changes of their raw aroma profiles"
Keywords:Animals Cattle Chickens Food Handling/methods Food Preservation/*methods *Lipid Peroxidation *Meat Odorants/*analysis Oxygen Pressure Taste Temperature Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis;
Notes:"MedlineSchindler, Sabrina Krings, Ulrich Berger, Ralf G Orlien, Vibeke eng Comparative Study England 2010/06/18 Meat Sci. 2010 Oct; 86(2):317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.036. Epub 2010 May 5"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 19-12-2024