Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAir pollution control through biotrickling filters: a review considering operational aspects and expected performance    Next AbstractCharacterisation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released by the composting of different waste matrices »

Environ Technol


Title:Comparison between conventional biofilters and biotrickling filters applied to waste bio-drying in terms of atmospheric dispersion and air quality
Author(s):Schiavon M; Ragazzi M; Torretta V; Rada EC;
Address:"a Department of Civil, Environmental and Mechanical Engineering , University of Trento , Trento , Italy. b Department of Biotechnologies and Life Sciences , University of Insubria , Varese , Italy"
Journal Title:Environ Technol
Year:2016
Volume:20151023
Issue:8
Page Number:975 - 982
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1095246
ISSN/ISBN:1479-487X (Electronic) 0959-3330 (Linking)
Abstract:"Biofiltration has been widely applied to remove odours and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from industrial off-gas and mechanical-biological waste treatments. However, conventional open biofilters cannot guarantee an efficient dispersion of air pollutants emitted into the atmosphere. The aim of this paper is to compare conventional open biofilters with biotrickling filters (BTFs) in terms of VOC dispersion in the atmosphere and air quality in the vicinity of a hypothetical municipal solid waste bio-drying plant. Simulations of dispersion were carried out regarding two VOCs of interest due to their impact in terms of odours and cancer risk: dimethyl disulphide and benzene, respectively. The use of BTFs, instead of conventional biofilters, led to significant improvements in the odour impact and the cancer risk: when adopting BTFs instead of an open biofilter, the area with an odour concentration > 1 OU m(-3) and a cancer risk > 10(-6) was reduced by 91.6% and 95.2%, respectively. When replacing the biofilter with BTFs, the annual mean concentrations of odorants and benzene decreased by more than 90% in the vicinity of the plant. These improvements are achieved above all because of the higher release height of BTFs and the higher velocity of the outgoing air flow"
Keywords:"Air Movements Air Pollutants/*analysis Benzene Desiccation Disulfides/analysis Environmental Monitoring Filtration/*instrumentation Models, Theoretical Odorants/*analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Waste Disposal, Fluid/*instrumentation Aermod Di;"
Notes:"MedlineSchiavon, Marco Ragazzi, Marco Torretta, Vincenzo Rada, Elena Cristina eng Comparative Study England 2015/09/26 Environ Technol. 2016; 37(8):975-82. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1095246. Epub 2015 Oct 23"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024