Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Attraction of the larval predator Elater ferrugineus to the sex pheromone of its prey, Osmoderma eremita, and its implication for conservation biology"    Next Abstract"Enantiomeric specificity in a pheromone-kairomone system of two threatened saproxylic beetles, Osmoderma eremita and Elater ferrugineus" »

Am J Bot


Title:Chemistry and geographic variation of floral scent in Yucca filamentosa (Agavaceae)
Author(s):Svensson GP; Hickman MO; Bartram S; Boland W; Pellmyr O; Raguso RA;
Address:"Department of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Coker Life Sciences Building, 700 Sumter St., Columbia, South Carolina 29208 USA;"
Journal Title:Am J Bot
Year:2005
Volume:92
Issue:10
Page Number:1624 - 1631
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.10.1624
ISSN/ISBN:0002-9122 (Print) 0002-9122 (Linking)
Abstract:"We identified volatiles from the floral headspace of Yucca filamentosa using gas chromatography and mass spectrometry and analyzed floral scent composition and variation among populations pollinated by different yucca moth species. Twenty-one scent compounds were repeatedly identified and most could be categorized into two major classes: (1) homoterpenes derived from the sesquiterpene alcohol nerolidol and (2) long chain aliphatic hydrocarbons. Two biosynthetic pathways are thus responsible for the majority of floral volatiles in Y. filamentosa. The homoterpene E-4,8-dimethylnona-1,3,7-triene, which is released systemically by higher plants upon herbivory, was the most abundant compound. Two di-oxygenated compounds not previously reported as floral compounds also were detected. No differentiation in floral scent was observed between populations pollinated by different yucca moths, nor was there any correlation between chemical distance and geographic distance among populations. The total release rate of volatiles differed significantly among populations, but not between populations with different pollinators. The combination of unique compounds and low variation in the fragrance blend may reflect highly selective attraction of obligate pollinators to flowers. The observed lack of differentiation in floral scent can putatively explain high moth-mediated gene flow among sites, but it does not explain conservation of odor composition across populations with different pollinators"
Keywords:
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINESvensson, Glenn P Hickman, Michael O Jr Bartram, Stefan Boland, Wilhelm Pellmyr, Olle Raguso, Robert A eng 2005/10/01 Am J Bot. 2005 Oct; 92(10):1624-31. doi: 10.3732/ajb.92.10.1624"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 25-12-2024