Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractCockroach aggregation: discrimination between strain odours in Blattella germanica    Next AbstractEcotoxicity of pesticides and semiochemicals used for control and prevention of conifer bark beetle (Dendroctonus spp.) outbreaks »

Food Chem


Title:Detection of extraction artifacts in the analysis of honey volatiles using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography
Author(s):Rivellino SR; Hantao LW; Risticevic S; Carasek E; Pawliszyn J; Augusto F;
Address:"Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, SP, Brazil"
Journal Title:Food Chem
Year:2013
Volume:20130511
Issue:3
Page Number:1828 - 1833
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.003
ISSN/ISBN:1873-7072 (Electronic) 0308-8146 (Linking)
Abstract:"Extraction using headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with flame ionisation detection (GCxGC-FID) was employed to evaluate the effect of SPME fractionation conditions (heating time and temperature) on the generation of artifacts. The occurrence of artifacts was more pronounced at higher fractionation temperatures and times which caused significant changes in the chromatographic profiles. The identification of the volatile fraction of the honey blend was performed through a two-dimensional gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer with time of flight analyser (GCxGC-ToFMS) by comparing the first dimension linear temperature programmed retention index ((1)D-LTPRI) with the peak's identities provided by the mass spectral similarity search. Several artifacts were found and identified - such as hydroxymethylfurfural, methyl-furone and furfural - and some of them were not previously detected as such in honey samples. These compounds were either the result of hydrolysis or thermal decomposition of components already present in the honey samples. This occurrence was attributed to the increased detectability provided by GCxGC compared to conventional GC. The possible emergence of previously unknown extraction artifacts as a general tendency related use of GCxGC instead of conventional GC is discussed as a result of these observations"
Keywords:"Brazil Chromatography, Gas/*methods Food Contamination/*analysis Honey/*analysis Quality Control Solid Phase Microextraction/*methods/standards Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis/isolation & purification Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography;"
Notes:"MedlineRivellino, Sandra Regina Hantao, Leandro Wang Risticevic, Sanja Carasek, Eduardo Pawliszyn, Janusz Augusto, Fabio eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't England 2013/07/23 Food Chem. 2013 Dec 1; 141(3):1828-33. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.05.003. Epub 2013 May 11"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024