Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Happy anniversary, Journal of Chemical Ecology!"    Next Abstract"Digital atlases of the antennal lobe in two species of tobacco budworm moths, the Oriental Helicoverpa assulta (male) and the American Heliothis virescens (male and female)" »

High Alt Med Biol


Title:Electronic Nose Technology Fails to Sniff Out Acute Mountain Sickness
Author(s):Berendsen RR; van Vessem ME; Bruins M; Teppema L; Aarts L; Kayser B;
Address:"1 Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, Netherlands . 2 Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center , Leiden, Netherlands . 3 The eNose Company , Zutphen, The Netherlands . 4 Institute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne , Lausanne, Switzerland"
Journal Title:High Alt Med Biol
Year:2018
Volume:20180320
Issue:3
Page Number:232 - 236
DOI: 10.1089/ham.2017.0145
ISSN/ISBN:1557-8682 (Electronic) 1527-0297 (Linking)
Abstract:"Berendsen, Remco R., Marieke E. van Vessem, Marcel Bruins, Luc J.S.M. Teppema, Leon P.H.J. Aarts, and Bengt Kayser. Electronic nose technology fails to sniff out acute mountain sickness. High Alt Med Biol. 19:232-236, 2018. AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an electronic nose can discriminate between individuals with and without acute mountain sickness (AMS) following rapid ascent to 4554 m. RESULTS: We recruited recreational climbers (19 women, 82 men; age 35 +/- 10 years, mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) upon arrival at 4554 m (Capanna Regina Margherita, Italy) for a proof of concept study. AMS was assessed with the Lake Louise self-report score (LLSRS) and the abbreviated Environmental Symptoms Questionnaire (ESQc); scores >/=3 and >/=0.7 were considered AMS, respectively. Exhaled air was analyzed with an electronic nose (Aeonose; The eNose Company, Netherlands). The collected data were analyzed using an artificial neural network. AMS prevalence was 44% with the LLSRS (mean score of those sick 4.4 +/- 1.4 [SD]) and 20% with the ESQc (1.2 +/- 0.5). The electronic nose could not discriminate between AMS and no AMS (LLSRS p = 0.291; ESQc p = 0.805). CONCLUSION: The electronic nose technology utilized in this study could not discriminate between climbers with and without symptoms of AMS in the setting of an acute exposure to an altitude of 4554 m. At this stage, we cannot fully exclude that this technology per se is not able to discriminate for AMS. The quest for objective means to diagnose AMS thus continues"
Keywords:Acute Disease Adult Altitude Sickness/*diagnosis Breath Tests/instrumentation *Electronic Nose Female Humans Male Middle Aged Proof of Concept Study Self Report Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis Ams ESQc Llsrs electronic nose exhaled breath;
Notes:"MedlineBerendsen, Remco R van Vessem, Marieke E Bruins, Marcel Teppema, Luc J S M Aarts, Leon P H J Kayser, Bengt eng 2018/04/12 High Alt Med Biol. 2018 Sep; 19(3):232-236. doi: 10.1089/ham.2017.0145. Epub 2018 Mar 20"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 06-11-2024