Title: | "Effects of relative humidity, temperature, and population density on production of cuticular hydrocarbons in housefly Musca domestica L" |
Address: | "Department of Animal Physiology, University of Groningen, Haren, The Netherlands. N.Noorman@biol.rug.nl" |
ISSN/ISBN: | 0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking) |
Abstract: | "The production of cuticular hydrocarbons by both males and females of Musca domestica L. under very wet conditions (90% relative humidity) compared to the production at 50 and 20% relative humidity is delayed up to at least 3 days after emergence from the pupae. Eight days after emergence, however, males contain the same amounts of hydrocarbons at 90, 50, and 20% relative humidity, whereas females at 90% still possess less of these substances than at 50 and 20%. It is suggested that this is due to the fact that males, being more active than females, need more cuticular hydrocarbons to prevent water loss. No indication is found that relative humidity has a different effect on the production of the sex pheromone, muscalure [(Z)-9-tricosene] by females than on the production of the other hydrocarbons. Male and female flies produce more hydrocarbons at 35 degrees C than at 20 degrees C. On females, the relative amounts of nonacosane and methyl- and dimethylnonacosanes are significantly higher at 35 degrees C than at 20 degrees C. Female flies produce some (Z)-9-tricosene after eight generations at low population density in contrast to females at high population density, which did not produce muscalure. We suggest that because of the relatively large contribution to the total population, the properties of a small number of females are likely to be expressed sooner in the next generations of small populations than in those of large populations" |
Keywords: | "Animals Chromatography, Gas Data Interpretation, Statistical Female Houseflies/*metabolism/physiology Humidity Hydrocarbons/*metabolism Larva Male Population Density Temperature;" |
Notes: | "MedlineNoorman, Nico Den Otter, Cornelis J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2002/11/27 J Chem Ecol. 2002 Sep; 28(9):1819-29. doi: 10.1023/a:1020565202524" |