Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMonoterpene emissions and carbonyl compound air concentrations during the blooming period of rape (Brassica napus)    Next AbstractDirect Sampling and Analysis of Atmospheric Particulate Organic Matter by Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry »

Proteomics


Title:Benchmarking sample preparation/digestion protocols reveals tube-gel being a fast and repeatable method for quantitative proteomics
Author(s):Muller L; Fornecker L; Van Dorsselaer A; Cianferani S; Carapito C;
Address:"Laboratoire de Spectrometrie de Masse BioOrganique, Universite de Strasbourg, CNRS, IPHC UMR 7178, Strasbourg, France"
Journal Title:Proteomics
Year:2016
Volume:16
Issue:23
Page Number:2953 - 2961
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201600288
ISSN/ISBN:1615-9861 (Electronic) 1615-9853 (Linking)
Abstract:"Sample preparation, typically by in-solution or in-gel approaches, has a strong influence on the accuracy and robustness of quantitative proteomics workflows. The major benefit of in-gel procedures is their compatibility with detergents (such as SDS) for protein solubilization. However, SDS-PAGE is a time-consuming approach. Tube-gel (TG) preparation circumvents this drawback as it involves directly trapping the sample in a polyacrylamide gel matrix without electrophoresis. We report here the first global label-free quantitative comparison between TG, stacking gel (SG), and basic liquid digestion (LD). A series of UPS1 standard mixtures (at 0.5, 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 25 fmol) were spiked in a complex yeast lysate background. TG preparation allowed more yeast proteins to be identified than did the SG and LD approaches, with mean numbers of 1979, 1788, and 1323 proteins identified, respectively. Furthermore, the TG method proved equivalent to SG and superior to LD in terms of the repeatability of the subsequent experiments, with mean CV for yeast protein label-free quantifications of 7, 9, and 10%. Finally, known variant UPS1 proteins were successfully detected in the TG-prepared sample within a complex background with high sensitivity. All the data from this study are accessible on ProteomeXchange (PXD003841)"
Keywords:"Acrylic Resins/chemistry Benchmarking Calibration Chromatography, Liquid/methods Fungal Proteins/*analysis/chemistry Gels/*chemistry Proteomics/instrumentation/*methods Reproducibility of Results Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methods Workflow In-solution diges;"
Notes:"MedlineMuller, Leslie Fornecker, Luc Van Dorsselaer, Alain Cianferani, Sarah Carapito, Christine eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Germany 2016/10/18 Proteomics. 2016 Dec; 16(23):2953-2961. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201600288"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 26-06-2024