Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDemographic side effects of selective hunting in ungulates and carnivores    Next AbstractArsenic in the food chains of a revegetated metalliferous mine tailings pond »

J Econ Entomol


Title:Effects of Food Bait and Trap Type on Captures of Rhynchophorus palmarum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Trap Bycatch in Southern California
Author(s):Milosavljevic I; Hoddle CD; Mafra-Neto A; Gomez-Marco F; Hoddle MS;
Address:"Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA. ISCA Technologies, Inc., Riverside, CA. Center for Invasive Species Research, University of California, Riverside, CA"
Journal Title:J Econ Entomol
Year:2020
Volume:113
Issue:5
Page Number:2407 - 2417
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toaa175
ISSN/ISBN:1938-291X (Electronic) 0022-0493 (Linking)
Abstract:"Rhynchophorus palmarum (L.) is an invasive pest responsible for killing thousands of ornamental Canary Islands date palms (Phoenix canariensis Chabaud) in San Diego County, CA. Two field experiments were conducted to compare the attractiveness of six different baits and two trap types. The tested baits were dates + water; dates + water + Saccharomyces cerevisiae; dates + water + S. bayanus; dates + water + S. pastorianus; 15% sugarcane molasses water solution mixed with 3% paraffinic oil, and a no bait control treatment. The two traps tested were white bucket traps (hanging 1.5 m above the ground and set on the ground) and black cone shaped Picusan traps (set on ground only). All traps were loaded with commercially available R. palmarum aggregation pheromone and the synergist ethyl acetate. Differences in weevil capture rates were observed across bait and trap types. Weevil captures were almost five times greater in Picusan traps compared to bucket traps that were hanging or placed on the ground. Adding dates and water alone or combined with S. cerevisiae to traps increased weevil captures compared to other baits and controls. Trap and bait types affected bycatch of nontarget arthropod species. In general, spiders, earwigs, and carabid beetles were most commonly recovered from Picusan traps, regardless of bait type. Scarab beetles, moths, and flies were found more frequently in bucket traps baited with molasses or dates mixed with S. bayanus. No effects of bait and trap type were associated with bycatch species richness"
Keywords:Animals California *Coleoptera Insect Control Pheromones/pharmacology Saccharomyces cerevisiae *Weevils bycatch detection tools invasive species palm weevils trap efficiency;
Notes:"MedlineMilosavljevic, Ivan Hoddle, Christina D Mafra-Neto, Agenor Gomez-Marco, Francesc Hoddle, Mark S eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2020/08/21 J Econ Entomol. 2020 Oct 16; 113(5):2407-2417. doi: 10.1093/jee/toaa175"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-11-2024