Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractInterpretive review: Semiochemicals in domestic pigs and dogs    Next AbstractKey Aroma Compounds in Oats and Oat Cereals »

Chemosphere


Title:Assessing inter-laboratory comparability and limits of determination for the analysis of cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes in whole Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)
Author(s):McGoldrick DJ; Durham J; Leknes H; Kierkegaard A; Gerhards R; Powell DE; McLachlan MS;
Address:"Water Science and Technology Directorate, Environment Canada, Burlington, ON, Canada L7R 4A6. Daryl.McGoldrick@ec.gc.ca"
Journal Title:Chemosphere
Year:2011
Volume:20110908
Issue:8
Page Number:1241 - 1247
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.018
ISSN/ISBN:1879-1298 (Electronic) 0045-6535 (Linking)
Abstract:"Cyclic volatile methyl siloxanes (cVMS) are high volume production chemicals used in a wide range of industrial and consumer products. Three cVMS compounds (D4, D5, and D6) have and are undergoing environmental risk evaluations in several countries and have been proposed for legal regulation in Canada. As interest in monitoring concentrations of these chemicals in the environment increase, there is a need to evaluate the analytical procedures for cVMS in biological matrices in order to assess the quality of data produced. The purpose of this study was to determine laboratory testing performance for measuring residues of D4, D5, and D6 in a standard set of fish homogenate samples and to estimate limits of determination for each substance. The samples sent to each laboratory consisted of homogenized whole body tissues of hatchery raised rainbow trout which were fed food fortified with D4, D5, and D6 (dosed) and trout that were fed standard food rations (control). The participants analyzed each sample using their analytical method of choice using their own standards and procedures for quantification and quality control. With a few exceptions, participating laboratories generated comparable results for D4, D5, and D6 in both the dosed and control samples having z-scores between 2 and -2. Method detection limits for the whole fish matrix were on average 2.4 ng g(-1) ww for D4, 2.3 ng g(-1) ww for D5, and 1.8 ng g(-1) ww for D6"
Keywords:"Animals Canada Limit of Detection Oncorhynchus mykiss/*metabolism Siloxanes/*analysis Volatile Organic Compounds/*analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical/*analysis;"
Notes:"MedlineMcGoldrick, Daryl J Durham, Jeremy Leknes, Henriette Kierkegaard, Amelie Gerhards, Reinhard Powell, David E McLachlan, Michael S eng Comparative Study England 2011/08/25 Chemosphere. 2011 Nov; 85(8):1241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.07.018. Epub 2011 Sep 8"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 25-11-2024