Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"Aloe vera Flowers, a Byproduct with Great Potential and Wide Application, Depending on Maturity Stage"    Next AbstractAn improved machine learning pipeline for urinary volatiles disease detection: Diagnosing diabetes »

Ann Bot


Title:Exploring evolutionary theories of plant defence investment using field populations of the deadly carrot
Author(s):Martinez-Swatson K; Kjoller R; Cozzi F; Simonsen HT; Ronsted N; Barnes C;
Address:"Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Biomin Research Center, Technopark, Tulln, Austria. Department of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark. National Tropical Botanical Garden, Kalaheo, Hawaii, USA"
Journal Title:Ann Bot
Year:2020
Volume:125
Issue:5
Page Number:737 - 750
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcz151
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8290 (Electronic) 0305-7364 (Print) 0305-7364 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are a number of disparate models predicting variation in plant chemical defences between species, and within a single species over space and time. These can give conflicting predictions. Here we review a number of these theories, before assessing their power to predict the spatial-temporal variation of thapsigargins between and within populations of the deadly carrot (Thapsia garganica). By utilizing multiple models simultaneously (optimum defence theory, growth rate hypothesis, growth-differentiation balance hypothesis, intra-specific framework and resource exchange model of plant defence), we will highlight gaps in their predictions and evaluate the performance of each. METHODS: Thapsigargins are potent anti-herbivore compounds that occur in limited richness across the different plant tissues of T. garganica, and therefore represent an ideal system for exploring these models. Thapsia garganica plants were collected from six locations on the island of Ibiza, Spain, and the thapsigargins quantified within reproductive, vegetative and below-ground tissues. The effects of sampling time, location, mammalian herbivory, soil nutrition and changing root-associated fungal communities on the concentrations of thapsigargins within these in situ observations were analysed, and the results were compared with our model predictions. KEY RESULTS: The models performed well in predicting the general defence strategy of T. garganica and the above-ground distribution of thapsigargins, but failed to predict the considerable proportion of defences found below ground. Models predicting variation over environmental gradients gave conflicting and less specific predictions, with intraspecific variation remaining less understood. CONCLUSION: Here we found that multiple models predicting the general defence strategy of plant species could likely be integrated into a single model, while also finding a clear need to better incorporate below-ground defences into models of plant chemical defences. We found that constitutive and induced thapsigargins differed in their regulation, and suggest that models predicting intraspecific defences should consider them separately. Finally, we suggest that in situ studies be supplemented with experiments in controlled environments to identify specific environmental parameters that regulate variation in defences within species"
Keywords:Animals *Daucus carota Herbivory Spain Thapsia garganica Apiaceae chemical defence fungal inhibition growth rate hypothesis growth-differentiation balance hypothesis optimal defence theory plant defence model resource exchange model of plant defence root-;
Notes:"MedlineMartinez-Swatson, Karen Kjoller, Rasmus Cozzi, Federico Simonsen, Henrik Toft Ronsted, Nina Barnes, Christopher eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Review England 2019/09/30 Ann Bot. 2020 Apr 25; 125(5):737-750. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz151"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 25-12-2024