Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractFlower color-flower scent associations in polymorphic Hesperis matronalis (Brassicaceae)    Next AbstractMetal-organic frameworks for advanced transducer based gas sensors: review and perspectives »

Ann Bot


Title:The impact of biochemistry vs. population membership on floral scent profiles in colour polymorphic Hesperis matronalis
Author(s):Majetic CJ; Raguso RA; Ashman TL;
Address:"Department of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. cmajetic@allegheny.edu"
Journal Title:Ann Bot
Year:2008
Volume:20080926
Issue:6
Page Number:911 - 922
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcn181
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8290 (Electronic) 0305-7364 (Print) 0305-7364 (Linking)
Abstract:"BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Studies of floral scent evolution often attribute variation in floral scent to differences in pollinator behaviour, ignoring the potential for shared biochemistry between floral scent and floral colour to dictate patterns of phenotypic variation in scent production. To determine the relative effects of shared biochemistry and/or localized population-level phenomena on floral scent phenotype, floral scent composition and emission rate were examined in five wild populations of colour polymorphic Hesperis matronalis (Brassicaceae). METHODS: Floral scent was collected by in situ dynamic headspace extraction on purple and white colour morphs in each of five wild populations. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy of extracts allowed determination of floral scent composition and emission rate for all individuals, which were examined by non-metric multidimensional scaling and analysis of variance (ANOVA), respectively, to determine the contributions of floral colour and population membership to scent profile variation. KEY RESULTS: Despite the fact that colour morph means were very similar in some populations and quite different in other populations, colour morphs within populations did not differ from each other in terms of scent composition or emission rate. Populations differed significantly from one another in terms of both floral scent composition and emission rate. CONCLUSIONS: Shared biochemistry alone cannot explain the variation in floral scent phenotype found for H. matronalis. Such a result may suggest that the biochemical association between floral scent and floral colour is complex or dependent on genetic background. Floral scent does vary significantly with population membership; several factors, including environmental conditions, founder effects and genetics, may account for this differentiation and should be considered in future studies"
Keywords:"Analysis of Variance *Biochemistry Brassicaceae/*physiology Flowers/*physiology Models, Biological *Odorants Pigmentation/*physiology Population Dynamics;"
Notes:"MedlineMajetic, Cassie J Raguso, Robert A Ashman, Tia-Lynn eng Comparative Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2008/09/30 Ann Bot. 2008 Dec; 102(6):911-22. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcn181. Epub 2008 Sep 26"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 25-12-2024