Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous Abstract"A membrane bioreactor for the simultaneous treatment of acetone, toluene, limonene and hexane at trace level concentrations"    Next AbstractDeterioration of organic packing materials commonly used in air biofiltration: effect of VOC-packing interactions »

Water Res


Title:"Comparative assessment of a biofilter, a biotrickling filter and a hollow fiber membrane bioreactor for odor treatment in wastewater treatment plants"
Author(s):Lebrero R; Gondim AC; Perez R; Garcia-Encina PA; Munoz R;
Address:"Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, Escuela de Ingenierias Industriales, Sede Dr. Mergelina, University of Valladolid, Dr Mergelina s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain(1). Department of Chemical Engineering and Environmental Technology, Escuela de Ingenierias Industriales, Sede Dr. Mergelina, University of Valladolid, Dr Mergelina s/n, 47011 Valladolid, Spain(1). Electronic address: mutora@iq.uva.es"
Journal Title:Water Res
Year:2014
Volume:20131010
Issue:
Page Number:339 - 350
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.055
ISSN/ISBN:1879-2448 (Electronic) 0043-1354 (Linking)
Abstract:"A low abatement efficiency for the hydrophobic fraction of odorous emissions and a high footprint are often pointed out as the major drawbacks of conventional biotechnologies for odor treatment. In this work, two conventional biotechnologies (a compost-based biofilter, BF, and a biotrickling filter, BTF), and a hollow-fiber membrane bioreactor (HF-MBR) were comparatively evaluated in terms of odor abatement potential and pressure drop (DeltaP) at empty bed residence times (EBRTs) ranging from 4 to 84 s, during the treatment of methyl-mercaptan, toluene, alpha-pinene and hexane at trace level concentrations (0.75-4.9 mg m(-3)). High removal efficiencies (RE > 90% regardless of the air pollutant) were recorded in the BF at EBRTs >/= 8 s, although the high DeltaP across the packed bed limited its cost-effective operation to EBRTs > 19 s. A complete methyl-mercaptan, toluene and alpha-pinene removal was recorded in the BTF at EBRTs >/= 4 s and DeltaP lower than 33 mmH2O ( approximately 611 Pa mbed(-1)), whereas slightly lower REs were observed for hexane ( approximately 88%). The HF-MBR completely removed methyl-mercaptan and toluene at all EBRTs tested, but exhibited an unstable alpha-pinene removal performance as a result of biomass accumulation and a low hexane abatement efficiency. Thus, a periodical membrane-cleaning procedure was required to ensure a steady abatement performance. Finally, a high bacterial diversity was observed in the three bioreactors in spite of the low carbon source spectrum present in the air emission"
Keywords:"Bacteria/growth & development Biodegradation, Environmental Bioreactors/*microbiology Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis Filtration/*instrumentation *Membranes, Artificial Molecular Sequence Data Odorants/*analysis Pressure Time Factors Volatile Orga;"
Notes:"MedlineLebrero, Raquel Gondim, Ana Celina Perez, Rebeca Garcia-Encina, Pedro A Munoz, Raul eng Comparative Study England 2013/12/04 Water Res. 2014 Feb 1; 49:339-50. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.055. Epub 2013 Oct 10"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 04-12-2024