Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractChange in dominance determines herbivore effects on plant biodiversity    Next AbstractModelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway »

Front Plant Sci


Title:"A Comparative Study of Food Source Selection in Stingless Bees and Honeybees: Scent Marks, Location, or Color"
Author(s):Koethe S; Fischbach V; Banysch S; Reinartz L; Hrncir M; Lunau K;
Address:"Institute of Sensory Ecology, Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany. Departamento de Biociencias, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Arido, Mossoro, Brazil. Instituto de Biociencias, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil"
Journal Title:Front Plant Sci
Year:2020
Volume:20200506
Issue:
Page Number:516 -
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00516
ISSN/ISBN:1664-462X (Print) 1664-462X (Electronic) 1664-462X (Linking)
Abstract:"In social bees, the choice of food sources is based on several factors, including scent marks, color, and location of flowers. Here, we used similar setups, in which two stingless bee species, Melipona subnitida and Plebeia flavocincta, and the Western honeybee, Apis mellifera, were tested regarding the importance of chemical cues, color cues, and location-dependent cues for foraging behavior. It was determined whether workers chose food sources according to (1) scent marks deposited by conspecifics, (2) the color hue of a food source, (3) the trained location or the proximity of a food source to the hive. All three species preferred the scent-marked over an unmarked feeder that was presented simultaneously, but M. subnitida showed a weaker preference compared to the other species. When trained to blue feeders all three bee species preferred blue, but A. mellifera showed the strongest fidelity. The training to yellow feeders led to less distinct color choices. Only workers of M. subnitida mostly orientated at the training position and the close proximity to the nest. Whether the distance of a feeding site influenced the choice was dependent on the tested parameter (color or scent marks) and the species. Workers of M. subnitida preferably visited the feeder closer to the nest during the scent mark trials, but choose randomly when tested for color learning. Worker honeybees preferred the closer feeding site if trained to yellow, but not if trained to blue, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. Workers of P. flavocincta preferred the closer feeder if trained to blue or yellow, and preferred the more distant feeder during the scent mark trials. The disparity among the species corresponds to differences in body size. Smaller bees are known for reduced visual capabilities and might rely less on visual parameters of the target such as color hue, saturation, or brightness but use scent cues instead. Moreover, the dim-light conditions in forest habitats might reduce the reliability of visual orientation as compared to olfactory orientation. Honeybees showed the most pronounced orientation at floral color cues"
Keywords:chemical cues color cues eusocial bees foraging behavior location-dependent cues;
Notes:"PubMed-not-MEDLINEKoethe, Sebastian Fischbach, Vivian Banysch, Sarah Reinartz, Lara Hrncir, Michael Lunau, Klaus eng Switzerland 2020/05/22 Front Plant Sci. 2020 May 6; 11:516. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00516. eCollection 2020"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 24-12-2024