Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractAutoregulation of subtilin biosynthesis in Bacillus subtilis: the role of the spa-box in subtilin-responsive promoters    Next AbstractThe effects of exposure to conspecific urine on urine-marking in male and female degus (Octodon degus) »

Environ Entomol


Title:Attractiveness of fermentation and related products to spotted wing Drosophila (Diptera: drosophilidae)
Author(s):Kleiber JR; Unelius CR; Lee JC; Suckling DM; Qian MC; Bruck DJ;
Address:"Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University, 4017 ALS, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA"
Journal Title:Environ Entomol
Year:2014
Volume:43
Issue:2
Page Number:439 - 447
DOI: 10.1603/EN13224
ISSN/ISBN:1938-2936 (Electronic) 0046-225X (Linking)
Abstract:"Laboratory screening bioassays and field trapping experiments of spotted wing drosophila flies, Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura) (Diptera: Drosophilidae), were conducted to determine the attractiveness of 17 compounds as well as to compare attractant efficiency during peak fruit ripeness and postharvest captures late in the season. Compounds structurally related to each of the fermentation products acetic acid, ethanol, ethyl acetate, and 2-phenethyl alcohol were screened for attractiveness compared with a soap water control in greenhouse cage bioassays. The compounds determined to be attractive in the greenhouse bioassay (methanol, ethanol, propanol, formic acid, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, propyl acetate, phenethyl acetate, phenethyl propionate, and phenethyl butyrate) were individually tested in the field added to apple cider vinegar (ACV). The acids were also tested individually in neutralized ACV (NACV; pH asymptotically equal to7). Combinations of the compounds were tested in NACV. The capture numbers in ACV traps were not significantly increased by the addition of any of the compounds tested, although significant deterrent effects of some of the compounds allowed differences between treatments to be observed. Compounds that are most prevalent in wine and vinegar (methanol, ethanol, acetic acid, and ethyl acetate) as well as phenethyl propionate and phenethyl butyrate were less deterrent than the other compounds tested in the field. Captures during peak fruit ripeness were compared with the postharvest period when fruit hosts were not available or were overripe. Although the total number of flies captured late in the season was lower, the trends in treatment performance were similar, indicating a consistent performance of these baits from peak fruit ripeness through postharvest"
Keywords:Acetic Acid Animals Biological Assay Drosophila/microbiology/*physiology Fermentation/*physiology Fruit/*chemistry/*parasitology Insect Control/economics/*methods Oregon Saccharomycetales/physiology Volatile Organic Compounds/analysis/*metabolism;
Notes:"MedlineKleiber, Joseph R Unelius, C Rikard Lee, Jana C Suckling, David Maxwell Qian, Michael C Bruck, Denny J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. England 2014/04/26 Environ Entomol. 2014 Apr; 43(2):439-47. doi: 10.1603/EN13224"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 19-12-2024