Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractComparison of fermented soybean paste (Doenjang) prepared by different methods based on profiling of volatile compounds    Next AbstractDoes the Aphid Alarm Pheromone (E)-beta-farnesene Act as a Kairomone under Field Conditions? »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Modulation of aphid alarm pheromone emission of pea aphid prey by predators
Author(s):Joachim C; Hatano E; David A; Kunert M; Linse C; Weisser WW;
Address:"Institute of Ecology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Dornburger Str. 159, 07743, Jena, Germany. Christoph.Joachim@tum.de"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2013
Volume:20130518
Issue:6
Page Number:773 - 782
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-013-0288-x
ISSN/ISBN:1573-1561 (Electronic) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Recent studies on animal alarm signaling have shown that alarm calls generally are not uniform, but may vary depending on the type and intensity of threat. While alarm call variability has been studied intensively in birds and mammals, little is known about such variation in insects. We investigated variability in alarm signaling in aphids, group-living insect herbivores. Under attack, aphids release droplets containing a volatile alarm pheromone, (E)-beta-farnesene (EBF), that induces specific escape behavior in conspecifics. We used a handheld gas chromatograph (zNose), which allows real-time volatile analysis, to measure EBF emission by pea aphids, Acyrthosiphon pisum, under attack from different predators, lacewing or ladybird larvae. We demonstrate that aphid alarm signaling is affected by the predator species attacking. Ladybirds generally elicited smaller EBF emission peaks and consumed aphids more quickly, resulting in lower total EBF emission compared to lacewing attacks. In 52 % of the replicates with lacewings and 23 % with ladybirds, no EBF was detectable in the headspace, although aphids secreted cornicle droplets after attack. We, therefore, examined EBF amounts contained in these droplets and the aphid body. While all aphid bodies always contained EBF, many secreted droplets did not. Our experiments show that alarm signaling in insects can be variable, and both the attacker as well as the attacked may affect alarm signal variation. While underlying mechanisms of such variation in aphid-predator interactions need to be investigated in more detail, we argue that at least part of this variation may be adaptive for the predator and the aphid"
Keywords:"Animal Communication Animals Aphids/physiology Chromatography, Gas Coleoptera/growth & development/physiology *Food Chain Insecta/growth & development/*physiology Larva/growth & development/physiology Pheromones/*metabolism Sesquiterpenes/*metabolism;"
Notes:"MedlineJoachim, Christoph Hatano, Eduardo David, Anja Kunert, Maritta Linse, Cornelia Weisser, Wolfgang W eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2013/05/21 J Chem Ecol. 2013 Jun; 39(6):773-82. doi: 10.1007/s10886-013-0288-x. Epub 2013 May 18"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 03-07-2024