Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractDirect and indirect effects of plant diversity and phenoxy herbicide application on the development and reproduction of a polyphagous herbivore    Next AbstractCorrelation between the green-island phenotype and Wolbachia infections during the evolutionary diversification of Gracillariidae leaf-mining moths »

Brain Behav Evol


Title:Chemical recognition of kingsnakes by crotalines: effects of size on the ophiophage defensive response
Author(s):Gutzke WH; Tucker C; Mason RT;
Address:"Department of Biology, Memphis State University, TN 38152"
Journal Title:Brain Behav Evol
Year:1993
Volume:41
Issue:3-May
Page Number:234 - 238
DOI: 10.1159/000113844
ISSN/ISBN:0006-8977 (Print) 0006-8977 (Linking)
Abstract:"When confronted by an ophiophagous (snake-eating) kingsnake, venomous snakes of the subfamily Crotalinae exhibit a suite of defensive responses including head hiding, thrashing, and an unusual response termed 'body bridging'. Other responses observed, such as biting and 'freezing', are more general in nature and can occur in a variety of contexts. Various crotalines of differing sizes were tested for their responses to kingsnakes (Lampropeltis getulus). Responses of individuals were recorded for up to 18 months. The results indicate that, if habituation can be overcome by periodically allowing a kingsnake to confront but not harm the crotaline, the response is dependent on the size of the crotaline, in that smaller specimens (< 0.9 m) respond readily, while larger snakes (> 1.0 m) tend not to respond. The size of the kingsnake apparently does not have an effect on the crotaline response. These data appear to resolve apparent conflicts in the literature regarding whether certain species respond to ophidian ophiophages. In addition, hexane extracts of kingsnake skin were fractionated using an alumina column. The various fractions obtained were tested to determine which elicited the defensive response. Activity was found only in the most non-polar fraction. Preliminary analysis by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry indicated that this fraction contained straight and branched, saturated and polyunsaturated long-chain hydrocarbons"
Keywords:"Agonistic Behavior/*physiology Animals Arousal/*physiology Chemoreceptor Cells/*physiology Fear/*physiology Habituation, Psychophysiologic/physiology Motor Activity/physiology Pheromones/physiology Predatory Behavior/*physiology Snakes/*physiology;"
Notes:"MedlineGutzke, W H Tucker, C Mason, R T eng Switzerland 1993/01/01 Brain Behav Evol. 1993; 41(3-5):234-8. doi: 10.1159/000113844"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 17-11-2024