Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractMeasurement of fine particulate matter nonvolatile and semi-volatile organic material with the Sunset Laboratory Carbon Aerosol Monitor    Next AbstractEnvironmental fate of trifluralin »

J Theor Biol


Title:Competition and allelopathy with resource storage: two resources
Author(s):Grover JP; Wang FB;
Address:"Department of Biology and Program in Earth and Environmental Science, University of Texas at Arlington, P.O. Box 19498, Arlington, TX 76019, United States. Electronic address: grover@uta.edu. Department of Natural Sciences in the Center for General Education, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan 333, Taiwan. Electronic address: fbwang@mail.cgu.edu.tw"
Journal Title:J Theor Biol
Year:2014
Volume:20140221
Issue:
Page Number:9 - 24
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.013
ISSN/ISBN:1095-8541 (Electronic) 0022-5193 (Linking)
Abstract:"Allelopathy is added to a familiar mathematical model of competition between two species for two essential resources in a chemostat environment. Both species store the resources, and each produces a toxin that induces mortality in the other species. The corresponding model without toxins displays outcomes of competitive exclusion independent of initial conditions, competitive exclusion that depends on initial conditions (bistability), and globally stable coexistence, depending on tradeoffs between competitors in growth requirements and consumption of the resources. Introducing toxins that act only between, and not within species, can destabilize coexistence leading to bistability or other multiple attractors. Invasibility of the missing species into a resident??s semitrivial equilibrium is related to competitive outcomes. Mutual invasibility is necessary and sufficient for a globally stable coexistence equilibrium, but is not necessary for coexistence at a locally stable equilibrium. Invasibility of one semitrivial equilibrium but not the other is necessary but not sufficient for competitive exclusion independent of initial conditions. Mutual non-invasibility is necessary but not sufficient for bistability. Numerical analysis suggests that when competitors display bistability in the absence of toxin production, increases in the overall magnitude of resource supply cause bistability to arise over a larger range of supply ratios between the two resources. When competitors display coexistence in the absence of toxin production, increases in overall resource supply destabilize coexistence and produce bistability or other configurations of multiple attractors over large ranges of supply ratios. The emergence of multiple attractors at high resource supplies suggests that blooms of harmful algae producing allelopathic toxins could be difficult to predict under such rich conditions"
Keywords:"Algorithms Allelopathy/*physiology Animals Biomass Competitive Behavior/*physiology Ecosystem Harmful Algal Bloom/physiology *Models, Biological Pheromones/biosynthesis Species Specificity Coexistence Droopx3s model Global stability Harmful algae Multiple;"
Notes:"MedlineGrover, James P Wang, Feng-Bin eng England 2014/02/25 J Theor Biol. 2014 Jun 21; 351:9-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 21"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 20-12-2024