Bedoukian   RussellIPM   RussellIPM   Piezoelectric Micro-Sprayer


Home
Animal Taxa
Plant Taxa
Semiochemicals
Floral Compounds
Semiochemical Detail
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
Control
Invasive spp.
References

Abstract

Guide

Alphascents
Pherobio
InsectScience
E-Econex
Counterpart-Semiochemicals
Print
Email to a Friend
Kindly Donate for The Pherobase

« Previous AbstractA new method to improve olfactory responses to GC effluents    Next Abstract"Antennal electrophysiological responses of three parasitic wasps to caterpillar-induced volatiles from maize (Zea mays mays), cotton (Gossypium herbaceum), and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)" »

J Chem Ecol


Title:Induction of volatile emissions in maize by different larval instars of Spodoptera littoralis
Author(s):Gouinguene S; Alborn H; Turling TC;
Address:"University of Neuchatel, Institute of Zoology, Laboratory of Animal Ecology and Entomology, C. P. 2, CH-2007 Neuchatel, Switzerland"
Journal Title:J Chem Ecol
Year:2003
Volume:29
Issue:1
Page Number:145 - 162
DOI: 10.1023/a:1021984715420
ISSN/ISBN:0098-0331 (Print) 0098-0331 (Linking)
Abstract:"Maize plants under attack by caterpillars emit a specific blend of volatiles that is highly attractive to parasitic wasps. The release of these signals is induced by elicitors in the caterpillar regurgitant. Studies suggest that plants respond differently to different herbivore species and even to different herbivore stages, thus providing parasitoids and predators with specific signals. We tested if this is the case for different larval instars of the noctuid moth Spodoptera littoralis when they feed on maize plants. Cut maize plants were incubated in diluted regurgitant from second, third, or fifth instar caterpillars. There were no differences in total amount released after these treatments, but there were small differences in the release of the minor compounds phenethyl acetate and alpha-humulene. Regurgitant of all three instars contained the elicitor volicitin. To test the effect of actual feeding by the larvae, potted plants were infested with caterpillars of one of the three instars, and volatiles were collected the following day. The intensity of the emissions was correlated with the number of larvae feeding on a plant, and with the amount of damage inflicted, but was independent of the instar that caused the damage. We also used artificial damage to mimic the manner of feeding of each instar to test the importance of physical aspects of damages for the odor emission. The emission was highly variable, but no differences were found among the different types of damage. In olfactometer tests, Microplitis rufiventris, a parasitoid that can only successfully parasitize second and early third instar S. littoralis, did not differentiate among the odors of maize plants attacked by different instar larvae. The odor analyses as well as the parasitoid's responses indicate that maize odors induced by S. littoralis provide parasitoids with poor information on the larval developmental stage. We discuss the results in the context of variability and lack of specificity in odorous plant signals"
Keywords:"Animals *Host-Parasite Interactions *Hymenoptera Larva Moths/*physiology Odorants Pheromones/*pharmacology *Plants, Edible Volatilization Zea mays/*chemistry;"
Notes:"MedlineGouinguene, Sandrine Alborn, Hans Turling, Ted C J eng Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't 2003/03/22 J Chem Ecol. 2003 Jan; 29(1):145-62. doi: 10.1023/a:1021984715420"

 
Back to top
 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
© 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 22-11-2024