Bedoukian   RussellIPM   Pherobank   Piezo-Electric-Micro-Sprayer


Home

Animal Taxa
  Order Index
  Families A-Z
  » Genus A-Z
  Species A-Z
  Common Names A-Z
  All Families
  All Common Names
Plant Taxa
Floral Taxa
Semiochemicals
Plant Compounds
Floral Compounds
Semiochemicals & Taxa
Synthesis
ID Tools
Control
Invasive spp.
References
Abstract
Guide
Alpha Scents
Alpha Scents
PheroBio
InsectScience
E-EcoNex
Print
Email to a Friend

« Previous GenusPlatynothrus    Next GenusPlatyperigea »

Semiochemicals of Genus Platynus

Phylum: Arthropoda
Subphylum: Uniramia
Class: Insecta
Order: Coleoptera
Family: Carabidae
Subfamily: Platyninae
Tribe: Platynini
 ¦
Discuss this Genus
  Edit this Record
  Help
¦



Bedoukain RussellIPM

Semiochemical(s):

Platynus assimilis Paykull
 
               Schildknecht H  1968d  Naturwissenschaften  55: 112   
    formic acid    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
 
 
Platynus brunneomarginatus Mannerheim
 
               Will KW  2010  J. Insect Sci.  10: 17   
    formic acid    34.2 ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
 
 
Platynus dorsalis Pontoppidan
 
               Schildknecht H  1968d  Naturwissenschaften  55: 112   
    formic acid    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
    methyl salicylate    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦    
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		 
 
 
Platynus magnus Bates
 
               Kanehisa K  1977  Appl. Entomol. Zool.  12: 225   
    formic acid    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
 
 
Platynus ovipennis Mannerheim
 
               Will KW  2010  J. Insect Sci.  10: 17   
    formic acid    73.5 ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
 
 
Platynus protensus Morawitz
 
               Kanehisa K  1985  Appl. Entomol. Zool.  20: 299   
    13-2Kt    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
    formic acid    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦    
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		 
 
 
Platynus protenus Bates
 
               Kanehisa K  1977  Appl. Entomol. Zool.  12: 225   
    formic acid    ¦Relative ratio of the component¦   ¦(*) indicates that compound is active¦   Al
¦Category of the chemical signal
A -   Attractant
Al -   Allomone
K -   Kairomone
P -   Pheromone
Sy -   Synomone¦
  
¦Source of the chemical signal
F -   Female
H -   Host (could be of plant or animal origin)
L -   Lure
M -   Male
M&F -   Male and Female
S -   Solider
Q -   Queen
W -   Worker¦
  
¦Amount
pg -   Picogram
ng -   Nanogram
µg -   Microgram
mg -   Milligram
g -   Gram¦
   		Defense substance 
 
 
Reference(s):

Will, K.W., Gill, A.S., Lee, H., and Attygalle, A.B. 2010. Quantification and evidence for mechanically metered release of pygidial secretions in formic acid-producing carabid beetles. J. Insect Sci. 10:17.
 
Kanehisa, K, and Kawazu, K. 1985. Differences in neutral components of the defensive secretion in formic-acid-secreting carabid beetles. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 20:299-304.
 
Kanehisa, K., and Murase, M. 1977. Comparative study of the pygidial defensive systems of carabid beetles. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 12:225-235.
 
Schildknecht, H., Maschwitz, U., and Winkler, H. 1968d. Über arthropoden-abwehrstoffe, XXXII. Zur evolution der Carabiden-wehrdrüsensekrete. Naturwissenschaften. 55:112-117.
 

 
Citation: El-Sayed AM 2024. The Pherobase: Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. <http://www.pherobase.com>.
Ⓒ 2003-2024 The Pherobase - Extensive Database of Pheromones and Semiochemicals. Ashraf M. El-Sayed.
Page created on 28-July-2024